The victims of terrorism are the heritage of our Democracy. They do not belong to one side or the other, and anyone who tries to claim them for their political interests is not only committing a mistake, but is committing villainy. Unfortunately, the PP is not the first time it has committed this villainy. Already long ago he broke the pacts, written and unwritten, in which there was a consensus to consider the problem of terrorism as a matter of State. And Feijóo has fallen into his own trap, demonstrating that he is not the leader of a renewed PP, but that he suffers from the same tics as the more rancid PP, expelled from the Government through a motion of censure for being corrupt and a cheater. It doesn't even make sense for him to ask for a minute of silence for an ETA victim on his own, which in the end sounds the same as if he had asked for a Hail Mary.
Because not only is he using a victim of terrorism with partisan interest, but he is using her as a throwing weapon, when in the end he ends up identifying his opposition to the Government with what he called “civic rebellion against ETA.” . Feijóo's famous trip to the center passes through the extreme right And Feijóo watched with satisfaction - from the seat provided to appear, I don't know if as leader or as godfather of the opposition - these maneuvers, Active Phone Number List because they belonged to a preconceived plan: that of partisanly celebrating anniversaries of ETA victims (first Ortega Lara, then Miguel Ángel Blanco...), desperately trying to convey a message loaded with impudence: they are the widow caused by ETA. Feijóo departs from the historical development of our Democracy when he assumes this “resesa” tactic (I write it in Galician to make it more genuine and meaningful): that is, tempered, even on the verge of breeding mold.
And he does it when he programs liturgies in that sense, protected by some of his media terminals, such as the Sixth, without going any further. They are not errors, but the expression of a will that tries to identify the coalition government and its supporters with the past of terrorism in Spain. A malicious and unfounded disqualification, which has no other purpose than to seek votes in Spain outside of Euskadi. A claim that makes water if you look at it from the point of view of logic. The only dignified and democratic way that exists to remember ETA at this time is to celebrate its disappearance more than a decade ago. Firstly, because the PP has not had the slightest qualms about agreeing with Bildu as many times as it has needed to; secondly, because that same PP negotiated with ETA, and in an unusual way (Aznar said) came to describe the terrorist group as a “national liberation movement”; thirdly, because Bildu - apart from having been participating in the democratic life of our country for some time.