in processing the project already puts the Government's own objectives at risk, imagine the damage it will cause to the social protection system in Brazil. Article 5, item LXXVIII, of the Constitution, provides for the reasonable duration of processes, prohibiting delay or speed that could harm the objectives of the State's action through Telegram Number Data the process [3] . If in administrative and judicial processes the reasonableness of the duration of the process must be observed, this canon is even more applicable to legislative processes, with repercussions that are normally more socially impactful than the final product of the administrative or judicial decision.
Given the fundamental right to a reasonable duration of the process, how can we admit that a Constitutional Amendment Proposal aimed at regulating security relations in Brazil over the next 40 years is approved with excessive haste, which clearly harms the democratic principle, the exercise of citizenship and the right citizens to understand res publica matters, especially those that concern their most important rights? The answer is that it cannot be admitted and perhaps that is why the political fight against the Brazilian Supreme Court, the judicial body that is ultimately responsible for deciding on the constitutionality of PEC 6/2019, is growing.