Standard metrics from the web such as page views and time of reading do not reveal the full picture in crypto media. It may be that the reader spends only two minutes on the article but subsequently, based on the information obtained there, makes a huge investment decision - which in turn the analytics will never discover.

Back when we launched Coinminutes Crypto, we decided to go with just the basic data of engagement. Our dashboard was monitoring the same things as mainstream publications: unique visitors, social shares, and comment counts. These numbers were giving us a false impression.

That moment of realization forced us to come up with crypto-specific methods to quantify influence instead of merely attention. The change was not instantaneous - we had to develop bespoke tracking instruments and establish standards reflecting the behavior of crypto audiences.

Key Metrics Setup: The CoinMinutes Engagement Pyramid

After going through these experiences and learning from them, our content evaluation is now based on a four-level pyramid that traces the engagement at a deeper level. Initially, we had a six-tier model which was too complex for use and hence, we decided to simplify it by having four layers instead:

Useful Reference: https://inkbunny.net/louisorboryne

Tier 1: Surface ‍‌‍‍‌Numbers

At the foundation, we track basic visibility:
Page views and unique visitors
Average‍‌‍‍‌ time on page
Scroll depth (extent of content that users actually see and read)
Bounce rate context (comparison with benchmarks for various types of content)
By themselves, these figures provide us with baseline data and are seldom able to reveal the whole story of content performance.

Tier 2: Reader Actions

The second level is about tracking reader engagement:
Comment quality and length (not only number of comments)
Social sharing patterns (which platforms and communities)
Backlinks from Cryptocurrency Market sites
Newsletter forwarding rates
How often people come back
Those behaviors reveal to us the content that is so powerful that it motivates readers to do something.

Tier 3: Community Building

The third tier looks at the community-building aspect of the content:
Discord/Telegram membership growth related to content topics
Subscriber conversion rates
Community discussions citing content
Influencers sharing the word
Cross-platform conversation starters
At this level, we see content as a tool for community growth.
The numbers alone cannot tell the whole story of content's impact, so we also collect feedback through:
Post-reading surveys (with completion rates of only 3-4% - very ‍‌‍‍‌disappointing)
Community mood tracking
Reader interviews (we aim for 5 per week)
Content suggestion tools
Success stories from people who actually used our stuff

These‍‌‍‍‌ feedback sources provide us with background that the numbers by themselves can not offer. When readers tell us how a guide helped them to conduct their first DEX transaction, we discover things that no dashboard is capable of showing us.

This information has a significant impact on the way our measurement method changes. As an illustration, after community feedback had revealed that readers were turning to our content as decision-making tools rather than direct advice, we felt the need to introduce "decision support efficiency" as a new main indicator to track. Our editorial and analytics teams had a debate on this issue. After some whiteboard sessions (and a small number of late nights), we arrived at the compromise system that is referred to in our setup.

Tier 4: Real-World Results

At the top of the pyramid of our measurement system, we have the tracking of real-world usage:
Wallet connection rates through embedded tools
Transaction activity linked to content timing
Protocol adoption rates following educational content
Tool usage jumps after tutorial publication
Investment flow patterns after analysis pieces

These numbers offer the clearest view of content that really leads to results but at the same time require a sophisticated tracking setup.

We assign different weights to each tier in our evaluation, with the action figures getting the highest value increase (5x in our current model). The impact of a piece with a few hundred page views but a high rate of usage will be greater than that of a viral content that produces no measurable action.

Content-Specific Measurement Methods

Various kinds of content have to be measured in different ways. In the case of news, we put our emphasis on quick reading numbers and social spread, whereas for educational content we employ completion tracking and usage feedback loops.

When it comes to project analysis topics, we gauge the changes in sentiment by using embedded polls. This method helps to find out whether our analysis has a real impact on the reader's point of view or just confirms what they have already thought.

Tutorials are subjected to the most rigorous measurement. Along with tracking completion rates, they also verify through follow-up surveys the actual usage. A tutorial with 70% success rate but fewer view counts is better than a popular guide that is hardly used in practice.

We tried to use comment sentiment as a prediction of content value but it turned out to be completely unreliable - there was no correlation with real usage figures. We spent three months trying to make it work and then finally gave up. Failure has always been a theme in our journey of measurement and we have learned a lot from it.

The 5-Point Content Value Setup

Coinminutes have established a system which can be employed by any crypto content creator basing on what our measurements have taught us.

Educational Value Score (EVS): Gauge knowledge transfer through pre/post-content quizzes or by verifying whether people actually do what they learned. One insight we gained was that headline A/B testing led to a 27% increase in our usage figures when we moved the focus of titles from the concept to the outcome.

Actionability Score: Indicate the proportion of readers who accomplish a suggested action after going through your content. For the finest pieces of our content, this figure fluctuates between 8 and 15%.

Community Catalyst Rating: Observe how content energizes discussions in different platforms and communities. After the ETH Shanghai upgrade in March 2025, the consumption of our protocol tutorials increased by 58%, and there was a 73% rise in Discord activity.

Decision Influence Factor: Ask readers through a survey how content influenced their decisions in making investments or adopting new technologies. This is the area where we have the least measurement strength - we are still in the process of finding reliable ‍‌‍‍‌methods.

Reference‍‌‍‍‌ Value Assessment: Evaluate how the content remain popular over time through the return visits and continued sharing after publication. Several of our 2023 guides are still bringing steady traffic and engagement.

What's Next in Crypto Content Measurement

The measurement landscape is changing continuously. We have several initiatives in the pipeline:

On-chain behavior tracking models have been improved to a higher level of sophistication, thus enabling a more accurate linkage of content influence to blockchain activity. For example, if a wallet interacts with a protocol that you have covered within 72 hours of reading your content, that connection offers powerful confirmation.

Cross-platform tracking is still a difficult issue, but it is very important. As crypto conversations move to Twitter, Discord, Telegram, and specialized forums, it becomes increasingly difficult to link these discussions to the original content, but at the same time, it becomes more valuable.

Now we use AI-assisted performance forecasting to help us identify which content will create long-term value. Our systems can identify factors that predict long-term engagement even before we publish by examining patterns in a large number of ‍‌‍‍‌pieces.

Picked For You: The Evolution of CoinMinutes: From Market Chaos to Trusted Voice